Path analyses vs seperate regressions PreviousNext
Mplus Discussion > Structural Equation Modeling >
Message/Author
 gibbon lab posted on Wednesday, December 05, 2012 - 2:34 am
Dear Professor,

I was just wondering what is the difference between a path analysise and a set of seperate regressions. I tried to do a simulation to understand the difference.

First, I generated three variables x, y and z based on a multivariate normal distribution with 1000 observations. Then I did two seperate simple regression models y=a+b*x+epsilon,z=alpha+beta*y+eta. After that I ran a path analysis in Mplus specifying x->y->z. I noticed that I actually got the same results for estimating a,b,alpha and beta in the path analysis. However, if I specify "y with z" in mplus, I get different results in the path analysis for estimating alpha and beta.

I understand that the command "y with z" correlates epsilon and eta which can not be done in seperate regressions. That is why I got different results.

My question: is correlating different residuals the only difference between a path analysis and seperate regression models? Do you recommend any references if I want to know more about this topic? Thanks a lot.
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Wednesday, December 05, 2012 - 5:01 pm
A good book is Introduction to Structural Equation models by Otis Dudley Duncan.
Back to top
Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: