Common methods variance PreviousNext
Mplus Discussion > Structural Equation Modeling >
Message/Author
 Tristan posted on Saturday, March 03, 2012 - 6:13 am
Hi there,

I am new to SEM and MPLUS, and attempting to model a latent factor that influences all indicators in the structural model as per the recommendations of Podsakoff et al (2003). I am getting some weird results when I compare the path coefficients in my structural models (no CMV factor versus CMV factor present). The coefficients (and overall R2 for endogenous variable) differs significantly between CMV and no CMV models, so I want to check if I am modelling CMV correctly. My code is below:

MODEL:
factor definition and path modelling omitted...

CMV by Q9ci_RecWelc-Q29_ServNeeds;
CMV@1;
CMV with RECEPT@0 ROOM@0 WAI@0 POSTAPP@0 SERVQUAL@0 Q24_Oasat@0;

Thanks so much,

Tristan
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Saturday, March 03, 2012 - 8:44 am
I see nothing wrong in what you present. To answer your question, I need to see the full outputs and your license number at support@statmodel.com.
Back to top
Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: