However, I first did my analyses with multilevel modeling and Iím trying to replicate it on Mplus to profit from additional features. When I do not enter the interactions I get exactly the same estimates from both approaches. However, when I enter the interaction, the estimates are not the same. So I wanted to see if the syntax Iím using is correct. Also, in multilevel I first entered the interaction of P1xP2 for the intercept and then for the slope (which corresponds to a three-way interaction with time). Is it ok to fit the two following models or it does not make sense: i s ON P1 P2 ; i ON inter;
Dear Professors- I am also running a simple growth curve model for my dissertation with 8 time points (violent behaviors across 4 months, a time point exists for every two weeks). I have two observed predictor variables (both continuous) - trait anger and anger rumination. I have hypothesized that the interaction between my two predictor variables predicts an increase in violent behaviors over time so that individuals who tend to ruminate to anger and are also high on trait anger (but not low on trait anger) show an increase in aggressive behaviors over time. I was wondering if I should use the same syntax as above to create the interaction term. If it is significant, I was wondering how I should follow-up on this interaction and how this interaction would be interpreted. Any help is greatly appreciated - thanks so much!
How would I follow-up on this significant interaction to determine if individuals who ruminate to anger and are high on trait anger show an increase in aggressive behaviors? Would I use the same methods as I would in a regular regression model - look at people high and low on trait anger (1SD above and below) and see if anger rumination is still a significant predictor of an increase in aggressive behaviors?