Inquiry about number of observations PreviousNext
Mplus Discussion > Exploratory Factor Analysis >
Message/Author
 HuiGuo Liu posted on Wednesday, April 15, 2009 - 12:40 pm
I remember that I have read somewhere about the number of observations needed to do CFA/EFA for categorical data.

It sounds like that as long as any number of observations of the 2 by 2 matrix generated by any two of the items/variables is larger than 5, categorical CFA/EFA is suitable.

And in that statement, there is also an exmple following to show that even sometimes the whole number of observations is not very large, categorical EFA/CFA could be performed since the required condition is not demanding at all.

I cannot remember where I have read that and whether this is a correct statement.

Does anyone get any idea about this?
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Thursday, April 16, 2009 - 11:51 pm
In general, you need more observations for categorical data than for continuous data. The only way to know how large a sample is needed in any particular situation is to do a Monte Carlo study. See the following reference:

Muthén, L.K. & Muthén, B.O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 599-620.
 HuiGuo Liu posted on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 - 8:55 pm
Thanks a lot of the response.

I saw the paper at a quick glance,and found that the CFA examples it used were all with continuous outcomes. But my own research is with 20 ordered variables. I just wonder are the test method and conclusion from the examples also applicable to my own research?

Many thanks.
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 - 10:02 pm
You can do the same thing with ordered categorical variables.
Back to top
Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: