|
|
Interpretation Of Factor Loading In CFA |
|
Message/Author |
|
|
Hi fellows, I have some issues interpreting the outcome of my CFA. Basically I'm checking the impact of various second order construct on performance. Somehow like this: Items <-- factor 1 (.60) Items <-- factor 2 (.60) Items <-- factor 3 (.60) factor 1 <-- second oder factor 1 (.54) factor 2 <-- second oder factor 1 (.82) factor 3 <-- second oder factor 1 (.30) second oder factor 1 --> Performace (.40) All item show standardised loadings > 0.6 on their destinct factor which is inline with the suggestion of Bagozzi and Yi (1988) However, factor loadings on the proposed 2nd order constructs vary from 0.3 to 0.8 and I wonder if there are also recommended tresholds for factor / second oder facor loadings, or if this just means that there are stronger and weaker factors within the higher construct. How'd you interpret the results above? Would be great if I can get your thoughts on that! Happy researching! |
|
|
This sounds like a question for a general discussion forum like SEMNET. |
|
Back to top |
|
|