

To Integrate or not in twolevel mode... 

Message/Author 

Anonymous posted on Monday, August 22, 2005  4:03 pm



hi Prof. Muthen For twolevel modeling with continuous dependent variables (only), unbalanced data and presence of missing data, Mplus allows ML, MLR, MLF for estimation in combination with integration or not. I can find from the tech. appendix the loglikelihood expression for balanced data. For unbalanced data, it says Mplus uses MUML. A few questions: 1) does it mean ML, MLR and MLF for unbalanced data are only still limited information method but the standard errors and chisquare test statistics are adjusted for unequal sample size differently? 2) from the expression (196) in the tech. appendix, there is no integration involved. when users specify: Algorithm=integration; (say in ex9.6) in mplus, what exactly the loglikelihood expression Mplus uses? When & Why we can choose do or not to do integration here? Which one give more reliable/better/robust results? 3) Any references you can recommend so I can read more or this. Thanks a lot. 

bmuthen posted on Tuesday, August 23, 2005  12:05 am



1) ML, MLR, MLF give ML parameter estimates in both the balanced and unbalanced cases (they differ in terms of SEs, although all of them are correct). MUML gives ML parameter estimates only with balanced data (and no random slopes and no missingness). 2) Numerical integration is not needed with 2level ML for continuous outcomes unless you have mixtures. It is needed for 2level ML with categorical and other nonnormal outcomes. In general, it is needed when the posterior distribution of the latent variables is not normal. If you use algo=int when it is not needed, you get the same results, but slower. 3) References related to numerical integration with ML and 2level modeling include the Biometrics articles by Gibbons and Hedeker. 

Back to top 

