|
|
Continuous and categorical indicators |
|
Message/Author |
|
|
Hi, Apologies if this is a too simple question, or previously dealt with, but I could not find it in previous threads. I am running a LCA model to identify subgroups of patients based on a number of symptoms. The variables for symptoms are continuous, but they can also be categorized into 4-level categorical variables each level being above a threshold for severity of symptoms. There are 10 symptoms and I have a very small sample of just above 60 patients. The model seems to work much better when I use categorical variables. It fits well into a (clinically sound) 2 class solution as indicated by several fit indices and likelohood tests. When I use variables as continuous the model never fits and all k+1 classes solution is always better than k classes. My questions are: 1)Why is this happening? 2) when reporting this in a manuscript, how can I justify for using the categorical vs the coninuous variables? Many thanks in advance. |
|
|
When you categorize the variable, you lose power. This could cause the fit to look better. You should have a substantive reason for categorizing the variable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|