Imputation of Multilevel Data PreviousNext
Mplus Discussion > Missing Data Modeling >
Message/Author
 Tanja Gabriele Baudson posted on Tuesday, January 21, 2014 - 4:15 pm
Hello,
I have tried to make a multilevel imputation of missing data using Bayesian estimation. It does result in 20 imputed data files indeed, but I am not sure whether I have done it correctly, as the message "Unexpected end of file reached in data file" appears when I try to use these imputed data files. Here's the syntax:
----
[...]
usevar =
ZTJnp10 !cont. IV, level 1
nostudcl !cont. IV, level 2
aa_berer !cont. IV, level 2
knowkid !cont. IV, level 1
sexkid !cat. IV, level 1
langkid !cat. IV, level 1
ses1 !cat. IV, level 1
ses2 !cat. IV, level 1
ses3 !cat. IV, level 1
l_kog_5; !cont. DV

idvariable = id;

cluster = classno;

within = knowkid sexkid langkid ses1 ses2 ses3 ZTJnp10;

between = nostudcl aa_berer;

missing = all(-99999);

DEFINE:

ANALYSIS:
estimator = bayes;
type = twolevel;
bseed = 72114;
bconvergence = .01;

DATA IMPUTATION:
impute = knowkid (c) sexkid (c)
langkid (c)
ses1 (c) ses2 (c) ses3 (c)
ZTJnp10 aa_berer;
ndatasets = 20;
save = tjimp*.dat;
thin = 1000;

MODEL:

OUTPUT:
stdyx;

-----
Thanks in advance,
Tanja
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Tuesday, January 21, 2014 - 5:19 pm
The variables in the imputed data sets may not contain the same variables in the same order as the original data set. The order of the variables and the format of the imputed data sets is given at the end of the output where the data sets are imputed.
 Tanja Gabriele Baudson posted on Wednesday, January 22, 2014 - 2:14 am
Thanks, Linda, this helps already -- indeed, that was one of the problem.

However, now a new problem has occurred: apparently, the imputed files contain missing values, indicated by an asterisk (actually, I had assumed that the use of MI is to replace these missings?). I get the error message that I have variation within clusters at the between-level, which, in the past, was usually the case when the data was not read properly. As the original format was 15.5, whereas an asterisk is rather of a format 1.0. Could this be the problem, and if so, what syntax command will solve it?

Thanks for your patience.
Tanja
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Wednesday, January 22, 2014 - 6:22 am
Please send the output where you imputed the data and the output where you are reading the imputed data and your license number to support@statmodel.com.
Back to top
Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: