I am conducting an exploratory factor analysis with categorical variables
VARIABLE: NAMES = v1-v60; CATEGORICAL = v1-v60;
ANALYSIS: TYPE = EFA 1 4
* The output indicates that chi-square value for ....WLSMV cannot be used....
I did some research and what I found indicated to use DIFFTEST....but I saw a post from Linda in 2012 which indicated this does not work with Type = EFA, please help. So, should I not use the Chi-Square results at all, and only focus on others such as RMSR value
I feel my post relates to this thread - hopefully I am on the right track!
My data (questionnaire data) is categorical (ordinal; 5-point Likert scale) and non-normal. After researching the best estimator for such cases, I planned to run an EFA using the WLSMV estimator. Despite this, I realised that the DIFFTEST option is not available using the WLSMV estimator when doing an EFA. After searching the discussion boards, it was suggested that to test the model difference I could run exploratory structural equation modelling in the program.
I have a1-a7 and v1-v8 items, and want to determine if the 1-factor or 2-factor model has better fit (this is preliminary and I have other subscales of a similar fashion). Does this approach sound right, or am I going down the complete wrong track? I know it is not appropriate to use the WLSMV chi-squares for difference testing, hence my line of thinking regarding DIFFTEST. In saying that, I am not sure if my models are nested?
If ESEM is appropriate, are you able to direct me to a resource that details how to run the syntax for this? I have looked at the "Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling" paper (Asparouhov & Muthén) but I getting confused as to how to specify an EFA model within this framework.
I have looked at the ex 4.2 output, which is similar to what I obtained when I ran my EFA. I observed that it has the '1-factor against 2-factor' model comparison under model summary information. Is this the same result I would obtain if I were able to run DIFFTEST with my EFA (using WLSMV)? I think when I initially looked at this model comparison I thought I could not interpret it, given the warning within the same output about the inappropriateness of using the chi-squares values for difference testing when using WLSMV.
If I am able to just use this information (which would be great!), would it still be correct to report the other model fit indices associated with the best model?
Reviving an older thread, I'm using version 8.1 and running an EFA w/ WLSMV estimator (binary data) but not getting the "models compared" section of the SUMMARY OF MODEL FIT INFORMATION portion of the output in UG Ex 4.2.
I'm confused as to whether I am doing something wrong with the EFA or if I should use ESEM. I would like to compare four nested models, as seen below.