| Message/Author |
|
|
| Anonymous posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2004 - 6:53 pm
|
|
|
| I've been running a number of CFA models on the same data set using dichotomous indicators and the WLSMV estimator. Models range between 1-3 latent variables. I noticed that following the analysis on a couple of the models the RMSEA was not reported. On the models concerned CFI=1 and TLI>1. Be glad of an explantion for this. Many thanks indeed. |
|
|
|
|
| I don't know which version of Mplus you are using. I think we now print something for RMSEA in all cases. Could you send the output and data to support@statmodel.com. RMSEA is most likely zero in your case. |
|
|
|
|
| While a simple CFA model with 4 indcators output from MPlus shows a RMSEA of 0.149 but LISREL is 0.019. Is the definition of RMSEA of MPlus different from that of LISREL. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
| Are the estimators the same? Are the chi-square values the same? Are the estimators the same? |
|
|
|
|
Does the new version of Mplus provide 90% CIs for the RMSEA when models are estimated with WLSMV? An editor is requesting that we report this information for a paper. Does anyone have a good response to her/his request?
Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
| Yes, Version 6 has 90% confidence intervals for WLSMV. |
|
|
| Back to top |
