Problems with twolevel basic analysis PreviousNext
Mplus Discussion > Multilevel Data/Complex Sample >
Message/Author
 Kerstin Mertz posted on Wednesday, February 17, 2016 - 2:15 pm
Dear Sir or Madam,

please forgive me for bothering you: Before testing my multilevel hypotheses I first tried to run a "twolevel basic" analysis to check if my data gets read correctly - and somehow I keep failing already.
I made sure that I do not have any blanks in my data file, all decimal points are dots instead of commas, all missings are coded as -99. The data file contains only numerical values. All command lines in my input file are shorter than 90 characters.
But weirdly, in MPlus I get a different number (120) and size (between 1-6) of clusters than in SPSS (165 clusters with a size between 3-6). Just for your info, my clusters are persons and each person provided data on 3-6 days. The results seem to be the same for a dat.-data file and a csv.-data file.
On top of that I get the following, very scary error message:
"A MATRIX COULD NOT BE INVERTED DURING THE H1 MODEL ESTIMATION. THE ESTIMATED WITHIN COVARIANCE MATRIX IS NOT POSITIVE DEFINITE AS IT SHOULD BE. COMPUTATION COULD NOT BE COMPLETED. PROBLEM INVOLVING VARIABLE SCD_T. THE PROBLEM MAY BE RESOLVED BY SETTING ALGORITHM=EM AND MCONVERGENCE TO A LARGE VALUE. THE H1 MODEL ESTIMATION DID NOT CONVERGE. THE SAMPLE STATISTICS COULD NOT BE COMPUTED."

I would be immensely grateful if you could help me in figuring out what Im doing wrong! And please forgive me if this is a very stupid question.
 Kerstin Mertz posted on Wednesday, February 17, 2016 - 3:21 pm
Dear Sir or Madam,

I am so very sorry, I just realized that the first part of my question was indeed stupid: The number and size of clusters differs because of the simple fact that I enabled listwise deletion in MPlus... I am very sorry! So I guess that my data file gets read correctly after all.

But sadly, there remains the problem detailed in the error message above.
Background information: SCD_T is a within variable which varies within persons across six days, thus, in SPSS I could only look at the descriptive statistics and histogramms of the SCD_T variable of each day etc (SCD_T1,.., SCD_T6). But they look all quite unremarkable (in fact, even better than some other variables). The means and standard deviations do not vary much between the days (the mean is always about 30, the standard deviation about 12). The distributions look approximately normal, just slightly positively skewed.

Do you have any idea what is going on here and what I can do about this problem? I am very reluctant to just delete this variable - unfortunately it is my most important predictor...

Thank you very much in advance for any insight!

Best regards,
Kerstin Mertz
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Wednesday, February 17, 2016 - 3:41 pm
Please send the output and your license number to support@statmodel.com.
Back to top
Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: