Message/Author |
|
|
Hello, I have *three waves* of data for individual children: (1) Time 0 = Kindergarten (readiness for school measure) (2) Time 1 = Grade 4 (academic achievement measure) (3) Time 2 = Grade 7 (academic achievement measure) My ultimate interest is seeing the way in which children's developmental trajectories (from Time 0 to Time 1 to Time 2) vary across residential neighbourhoods. Here is the rub: Because the Time 0 measure is 'non-equatable' with the Time 1&2 measures (they measure different constructs), then I *cannot* include the measures in a three-wave growth model, or else the results would simply be uninterpretable (as per Singer & Willett, 2003). Therefore, can I instead run a regular two-level HLM model (kids within neighbouhoods) within the SEM framework, in which the Time 2 measure is my DV and the Time 0&1 measures simply serve as Level-1 predictors? If so, can I use SEM to explore both (a) the effect of particular Level-1 mediators and (b) the role of particular Level-2 predictors? Thanks for any guidance! |
|
|
It is hard to do growth modeling even with three repeated measures. I would stick with a simple model of either: y2 ON y1; y1 ON y0; or y2 ON y1 y0; y1 ON y0; How many neighborhoods do you have and how many children per neighborhood? |
|
|
Dear Dr. Muthen, Thanks so much for your reply. I have 30 neighbourhoods, and approximately 40-100 children per neighbourhood. I figured that a simple two-level model was going to be the way to go, rather than a growth model. Therefore, I am leaning towards [y2 ON y1 y0]. Thanks again! |
|
|
Dear Professors, In a study with repeated measures, there are ten waves. The research question is whether an observed continuous UV influences an observed continuous AV. One is not interested in whether there is a trend in time. One would like to know, instead, whether the UV at t influences the AV at t+1. My questions: Q1: Is it possible to model this case as a two-level model in Mplus (with the individuals at level 2 and the measures of the waves at level 1?) Q2: Given that one is not interested in the trends, is it possible to ignore the sequence of the waves (except the fact that the UV at t is assigned to the AV at t+1)? Best regards, Daniel |
|
|
Q1: Check our Time series page for ways to do this: http://www.statmodel.com/TimeSeries.shtml The UG has many such examples in Chapter 9. Also, we have Short Course Topics 12 and 13 with videos and handouts on this. 10 times points is a bit small for this, but your model seems simple. Q2: Don't know what you mean by "ignore the sequence" but I think the above sources will answer this. |
|
|
Many thanks. If I may specify my question a bit: If I am not interested in the effect of time or any trends, but only interested in the effect of a measured continuous UV, could I simply specify a multilevel model (with individuals at level 2, and time points at level 1)? Is there a problem with this two-level design? |
|
|
Q1: Regular multilevel modeling does not easily allow for UV at t influencing the AV at t+1 (the time points need to be the same). But the time series approach I referred to does allow this in a very straightforward way. And it also allows for auto-regression. Q2: See above. |
|
|
Thank you! The short courses, the examples, and your comments were very helpful. If I may double-check whether I specify my model correctly: The aim of following model is to test whether x has an effect on y. (For the sake of simplicity, there is only an immediate effect of x on y modelled in this example.) %Within% sy| y on y&1; sx| y on x; %Between% y on xm; y sy sx with y sy sx; |
|
|
(The background for that preceding post: I was wondering whether one could specify "s | y on y&1 x;" but since I have not found this line in an example, I guess that this is not advisable.) |
|
|
With only 10 time points, you need to keep the model simple and not use random slopes, only random intercepts. So say: %Within% y on y&1; y on x&1; x on x&1; %Between% y on x; Regarding number of time points and N, see Schultzberg, M. & Muthén, B. (2018). Number of subjects and time points needed for multilevel time series analysis: A simulation study of dynamic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25:4, 495-515, DOI:10.1080/10705511.2017.1392862. (Supplementary material). |
|
Back to top |