Standardized Solutions
Message/Author
 Anonymous posted on Tuesday, December 21, 2004 - 8:40 am
Is it possible to obtain standardized solutions in either TWOLEVEL or COMPLEX options in multilevel studies?
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Tuesday, December 21, 2004 - 11:11 am
As far as I know, it is available for both.
 Jennie Jester posted on Thursday, December 23, 2004 - 10:17 am
I am working on a model where I have data from moms and dads and their children. I am trying to estimate the relationship between executive functioning as a latent variable in the parents and their kids, when some of the kids are siblings. I developed a model that fits nicely (CFI=.97) when I fit the parent and child data for executive functioning using type=complex. (I decided to do it this way rather than try a 2-level model, because the number of parameters (76) in the 2-level model was getting high with respect to the number of observations (183)). The problem comes in when I add in IQ as a covariate. The model fit goes bad (CFI=.82) and the standardized regression loading of child IQ on child executive functioning is greater than one, and (therefore) the residual variance of the child executive functioning is negative. Do you have any ideas for what might be causing these problems and how to proceed?

Thanks,

Jennie
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Thursday, December 23, 2004 - 10:22 am
Can you send the two outputs to support@statmodel.com -- the one with and without IQ?
 jan posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 3:04 am
Dear all,
I have quite a beginner's question. I am wondering about the standardized coefficients Mplus offers using "Type is twolevel".

I am conductig a simple random intercept model (Y = G00 + G01*(x_mean) + G10*(x) + U0 + R). Mplus with "Type is twolevel" offers standardized coefficents in the output. As far as I know, other software (e.g. HLM) won't offer you standardized coefficients in multilevel analysis (but maybe I am wrong about this). Moreover I can't remember that I have read any paper presenting standardized regression coefficients for multilevel regression results. Thus, I am wondering, if it would be correct, to report the standardized coefficients Mplus offers.

Moreover I'm not sure, if I understand the Mplus User's guide correctly, as I understood "type ist twolevel random" is only needed analyzing random slopes or if I should use this option for random intercept models, too.

Thank you very much!
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 8:37 am
For models with random intercepts but not random slopes, Mplus standardizes the coefficients using the within variances for within parameters and the between variances for between parameters. I don't know of any reference for this but I do think it makes sense. Whether you want to report them would be up to you.

You need TYPE=TWOLEVEL; to estimates random intercepts. You need TYPE=TWOLEVEL RANDOM; to estimate random slopes.
 jan posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 9:01 am
 Jan Hochweber posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - 6:15 am
I've noticed that standardization in models with random slopes causes difficulties as the variance of y depends on the values of x.

I wonder what happens if I only standardize by the (within unit) sd of x.
(My assumption is that this causes no problems as the varying variance of y is
not part of my calculation)

Is it possible to express the sd of the random slope distribution by the sd of x, for example:

random slope sd: 1.2
x sd: 0.8

rescaled random slope sd: 1.2*0.8

and to do the same for the mean slope (multiplying by the sd of x)?

Thank you.
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - 2:05 pm
You can standardize with respect to x only. It looks like you are doing it correctly.
 Isbelle Schmidt posted on Friday, September 27, 2013 - 8:55 am
Hello Mr.Muthen,
i am working on my diploma thesis, which exists of an examination of the BFLPE and BIRGE. I am using the type=twolevel option in Mplus and all continuous variables were standardized(M=0, SD=1)before entering the data in MPLUS. The dependent variable is a continuous variables (self-concept) and the predictors are continuous and binary. So, my question:
Which type of standardization should I choose?

 Linda K. Muthen posted on Friday, September 27, 2013 - 12:00 pm
If you standardize your variables, the solution is standardized. I would not, however, standardize my variables unless I had a particular reason to do so. You will only obtain correct results with standardized variables if you have a scale free model.
 Isbelle Schmidt posted on Friday, September 27, 2013 - 3:06 pm

I standardized the variables because I am wanted to have all variables in the same metric, grand-mean centered and to built the aggregated class ability (aggregated z-Values).To test the BFLPE the grand-mean centering has the advantage that the BFLPE could directly been observed by a negative b from the aggregated class ability on self-concept.

I thought that the in Mplus unstandardized ouput with the standardized variables is the same as
using the grand mean centering in Mplus and than using sdyx. Is this so?

 Linda K. Muthen posted on Saturday, September 28, 2013 - 11:23 am
You should run the analysis both ways and see if they are the same.
 Isbelle Schmidt posted on Friday, October 04, 2013 - 1:19 am
Hello,
i did it and the standardized output in Mplus are nearly the same for z-standardized variables and grand-mean centered variables.
Could you tell me what the difference is between stdyx, stdy and std?
Thanks a lot!
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Friday, October 04, 2013 - 6:12 am
See the STANDARDIZED option in the user's guide.