|
Message/Author |
|
EmilyBo posted on Wednesday, April 05, 2017 - 9:10 pm
|
|
|
How can I obtain the biserial correlation between f1 and c in the Mplus output file? Here is my Mplus code: VARIABLE: NAMES = X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17 X18 X19 X20 X21 RT_X1 RT_X2 RT_X3 RT_X4 RT_X5 RT_X6 RT_X7 RT_X8 RT_X9 RT_X10 RT_X11 RT_X12 RT_X13 RT_X14 RT_X15 RT_X16 RT_X17 RT_X18 RT_X19 RT_X20 RT_X21 ST_ID; MISSING=.; CATEGORICAL = X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17 X18 X19 X20 X21; CLASSES = c(2); Auxiliary = ST_ID; ANALYSIS: TYPE=MIXTURE; START=0; ALGORITHM = INTEGRATION EM; Model: %OVERALL% f1 with c; f1 BY X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17 X18 X19 X20 X21; %c#1% [RT_X1 RT_X2 RT_X3 RT_X4 RT_X5 RT_X6 RT_X7 RT_X8 RT_X9 RT_X10 RT_X11 RT_X12 RT_X13 RT_X14 RT_X15 RT_X16 RT_X17 RT_X18 RT_X19 RT_X20 RT_X21]; %c#2% [RT_X1 RT_X2 RT_X3 RT_X4 RT_X5 RT_X6 RT_X7 RT_X8 RT_X9 RT_X10 RT_X11 RT_X12 RT_X13 RT_X14 RT_X15 RT_X16 RT_X17 RT_X18 RT_X19 RT_X20 RT_X21]; f1@1; OUTPUT: TECH3; Thanks a lot in advance. |
|
|
You don't. The f1 with c statement is not Mplus language. Instead, their relationship is characterized by different means and variances for f1 given different c classes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|