UG Example 7.9 output interpretation PreviousNext
Mplus Discussion > Latent Variable Mixture Modeling >
Message/Author
 William Johnson posted on Friday, September 11, 2020 - 5:59 am
UG Example 7.9 output how to interpret?
In Model results:
Categorical Latent Variables
Means
C#1 -0.085 0.096 -0.889 0.374
What does 0.374 indicate here? The two classes solution is problematic?
Tech 7
SAMPLE STATISTICS WEIGHTED BY ESTIMATED CLASS PROBABILITIES FOR CLASS 1
Covariances
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4
________ ________ ________ ________
Y1 1.111
Y2 0.021 0.966
Y3 -0.034 -0.033 0.892
Y4 -0.072 0.010 0.071 1.113
Does the negative covariance value between Y1 and Y3 signify a “Heywood” case? Or it is of correlation?
Thanks in advance. My apology if these simple questions appear somewhere else in the discussion board.
 Bengt O. Muthen posted on Friday, September 11, 2020 - 5:59 pm
Q1: It is the p-value

Q2: No.

Q3: No; Heywood cases have to do with factor analysis.

Q4: It is a covariance.
 William Johnson posted on Friday, September 11, 2020 - 10:59 pm
Dear Professor Muthen,
Thanks for your clarification. This is a follow-up question.
I understand it's the p-value, and the number -0.085 indicates the logit odd of being in C1 compared to C2, which can be converted to obtain the probability. However, I still can't get the meaning of P-value here.
Also, about the covariance. Do we need to watch out the negative covariances presented like the above in LPA analysis. Because the journal articles and textbooks talks a lot of statistical adequacy (e.g., no negative variance, Bauer & Curran, 2003) and numerous indices such as BIC, LMR and etc. So I was wondering if there was any special meaning behind a negative covariance. Thanks again for your quick reply.
 Bengt O. Muthen posted on Sunday, September 13, 2020 - 5:33 pm
The logit p-value refers to the logit being significantly different from 0 or not. It is typically not an interesting test in this context. Instead you want to focus on the probabilities related to the logits - see end of Chapter 14 of the UG. to learn the basics about mixtures, you can watch our Short Course videos on our website.

A negative covariance is like a negative correlation - nothing to be concerned about.
 William Johnson posted on Sunday, September 13, 2020 - 8:44 pm
Dear Professor Muthen, Thanks for the vivid explanation. I will put more time in learning the basics of mixture modeling from UG and the related videos at your website.
Back to top
Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: