Hi, I am new to MPlus and I am a bit lost in all the information available. I am interested in identifying different trajectories of a continuous indicator (3 time-points), as well as a set of cavariates that predicts class inclusion. Finally, I want to see if the trajectories have different consequences (distal outcomes at T3 - continuous). Below is my syntax:
int slp ON sex Excl1 Vict1 PrSoc1 F_Inv1 FQ1 M_SSup1 M_NgI1 M_Pow1;
C#1-C#3 ON sex Excl1 Vict1 PrSoc1 F_Inv1 FQ1 M_SSup1 M_NgI1 M_Pow1;
%c#1% int; slp;
%c#2% int; slp;
%c#3% int; slp;
%c#4% int; slp;
My questions are: 1. Is it necessary to include the regression command of the intercept and slope in all classes (or just in the Overall model)? 2. How to compare the trajectories regarding the distal outcomes?
1. The standard and more parsimonious approach is to not let the regression vary across classes, so you specify it only in Overall.
2.The distal outcome means will vary across classes as the default. If you want to test mean differences you label these means and then compute their difference in Model Constraint. if you don't want to include the distal in the model, you can study these means using the Auxiliary option DCON.
Note that as a first step you may want to use the default of class-invariant variances and therefore not mention int, slp in each class.
I'm trying to perform the 3 step method, but I can't seem to find the "Logits for the Classification Probabilities the Most Likely Latent Class Membership (Row) by Latent Class (Column)" table. I can only find the "Average Latent Class Probabilities". Can you tell me why this happens?
Also, if my original model has an entropy of .889 (sample size =260), do you think there will be severe bias if I choose the AUXILIARY=(E) option?
I don't think we added these logits until Version 7.11.
Anne Arnett posted on Tuesday, August 12, 2014 - 10:27 am
I am fitting a growth mixture model with a continuous outcome (a3-a15, 5 time points measured at different ages for each participant). Latent classes are predicted by a continuous variable (x). I also have a distal binary outcome. My data includes siblings, so the model TYPE= MIXTURE RANDOM COMPLEX. The model is:
MODEL: %OVERALL% i s | a3-a15 AT cage3-cage15; i s on x; C on x;
My question is, is it necessary to include the statement 'i s on x'? When I do this with more than 2 classes estimated, I get a non-positive PSI, and when I remedy this by fixing s@0, it makes it very difficult to replicate the -LL. What would it mean to have x only predicting C, rather than all of the latent variables?
says that these growth factors vary as a function of x also within classes. So for instance, a high x value tends to create a high i, a high starting point, within each of the classes.
You can check BIC to see if i s on x; is needed.
Anna King posted on Tuesday, September 16, 2014 - 1:35 pm
I'm trying to use the PC method to analyze a GMM model. I included AUXILIARY into the VARIABLE part. I don't know why it didn't work. It kept telling me that X is an unknown variable. Could you please tell me why? Below is the codes I wrote. Thanks!
Check that you are doing it correctly as described in Appendix A page 3 of the paper on our website:
Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21:3, 329-341. The posted version corrects several typos in the published version. An earlier version of this paper was posted as web note 15. Appendices with Mplus scripts are available here.
Anna King posted on Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - 8:32 am
Sorry to disturb you again, Professor! I did use the 3-step method this time and I have the codes like:
The output part shows the regression coefficients from Categorical Latent Variables on X3 and X4. Then there is also "TESTS OF CATEGORICAL LATENT VARIABLE MULTINOMIAL LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS USING THE 3-STEP PROCEDURE". May I know which numbers I should take? Also, does my code make any sense?
Anna King posted on Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - 9:52 am
So, "TESTS OF CATEGORICAL LATENT VARIABLE MULTINOMIAL LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS USING THE 3-STEP PROCEDURE" shows the regression coefficients between class and covariates?
I wrote the last codes based on Appendix C because the No.15 paper mentions that in MPlus Version 7 estimations using the 3-step method is not allowed although within a montecarlo simulation it is allowed. So, the DEFINE command is used to duplicate the variable that is to be used in the model. It seems that I don't need to do this any more. Is that correct? Thanks!