Exogenous categorical variables in pa... PreviousNext
Mplus Discussion > Categorical Data Modeling >
Message/Author
 seungjin lee posted on Sunday, April 10, 2016 - 1:12 pm
How to set up the syntax for the model (path analysis) which has both Exogenous categorical variable and Exogenous continuous variables in path analysis for continuous outcome variable (endogenous variable?

There are two types of Exogenous categorical variable: Binary and nominal (1= BA 2= MA C=PHD 4=OTHER)
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Sunday, April 10, 2016 - 4:49 pm
The model is estimated conditioned on the observed exogenous variables in regression and path analysis. They can be binary or continuous. In both cases, they are treated as continuous. You should create a set of dummy variables for the nominal variable.
 seungjin lee posted on Sunday, April 10, 2016 - 6:20 pm
Hello Dr, Muhen,

You mean the way to build syntax is not different between continuous and continuous exogenous variable. For example,

MODEL=NOMEANSTRUCTURE;
INFORMATION=EXPECTED;
model:
model:
y3 on x1 x2 y1 y2;
y1 on x1 x2;
y2 on x1 x2;

This is normal way to build syntax in a path model. In other words, regardless of the type of scale of exogenous variables (binary or continuous), the way to write syntax is not changed...

Am I on the track?

Thanks
 seungjin lee posted on Sunday, April 10, 2016 - 9:15 pm
How to interpret the covariance/correlation between two binary exogenous variables in a path analysis?

Is this a pearson correlation?
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Monday, April 11, 2016 - 10:11 am
Yes, you don't distinguish between exogenous variables due to their scale.

A Pearson correlation.
 Samantha Brady posted on Friday, December 15, 2017 - 9:42 am
Can you explain why Mplus doesn't distinguish between binary or continuous for exogenous variables. I would like to report a correlation table of my path model but am not sure if Pearson's is the appropriate correlation coefficient for the exogenous binary variable included. Would it be ok to report Peason's in a correlation table even though one variable is not continuous? Thank you!
 Bengt O. Muthen posted on Friday, December 15, 2017 - 5:09 pm
Mplus doesn't distinguish between binary or continuous for exogenous variables because that is not done in regular regression. You can if you like put a binary exog vble on the Categorical list, but that makes an assumption of an underlying normal distribution for this variable which is not necessary. You can present regular Pearson correlations for the binary variables, just being clear that that is what they are. It isn't a perfect summary of the data with categorical variables (raw data is) but it's still informative.
Back to top
Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: