Message/Author 


Dear all, I have a question regarding multigroup analysis with 3 groups when performing SEM. When comparing the chisquare and df between the unconstrained and constrained model, is there a way to see if there is a significant difference between each of the groups (i.e., group 1 vs. 2; group 2 vs. 3; group 1 vs. 3)? And if so where can I see it in the output? Or is it just possible to tell that there is an overall difference? Thank you so much for your answer in advance. CarmenMaria 


You would need to use just the data for groups 1 and 2, 1 and 3, and 3 and 3. You can do overall difference tests or test individual parameters. You can also use MODEL TEST. 

ellen posted on Sunday, September 09, 2012  11:27 pm



Hi Dr. Muthen, I am trying to compare parameter estimates across 3 groups. I heard that parameter differences can be tested by MODEL TEST in Mplus, but I am not sure how to write the Mplus language for MODEL TEST. Could you tell me what I should write in the input file for performing MODEL TEST to examine whether parameters are equal across groups? My model is: GROUPING = race (1=African 2=Asian 3=Hispanic) ; ANALYSIS: ESTIMATOR = MLR ; MODEL: Rm By R1 R2 R3 ; Ot By O1 O2 O3 ; Sg By S1 S2 S3 ; De BY D1 D2 D3 ; Sg ON Rm ; Sg ON Ot ; Sg ON De ; Rm WITH Ot ; Rm WITH De; Ot WITH De; [Rm@0 Ot@0 Sg@0 De@0] ; MODEL African: MODEL Asian: [R1  D3] ; MODEL Hispanic: [R1  D3] ; The Multigroup Chisquare difference test was significant. However, it only tells me there is overall difference; it does not tell me whether certain parameters are invariant while others are noninvariant. Rather than doing overall difference tests or constraining each parameter one at a time, how do I write the MODEL TEST language to test for specific parameter differences? (For instance, if I want to see whether the parameters of "Sg ON Rm" and "Rm with De" are equivalent across groups?) 


You need to label the parameters you want to test. See the user's guide under MODEL CONSTRAINT to see how labeling is done. See MODEL TEST for an example of how to test using the labels. 


Hi Dr. Muthen, On Wednesday, June 27, 2012  11:37 am, you wrote: You would need to use just the data for groups 1 and 2, 1 and 3, and 3 and 3. You can do overall difference tests or test individual parameters. You can also use MODEL TEST. Di you mean "and 2 and 3" instead of "3 and 3"? Thank you! 


Yes. 

Daniel Lee posted on Tuesday, January 17, 2017  12:51 pm



Hi Dr. Muthen, I am conducting a multigroup LGM. Is there a way to test if there is a significant difference in the slope of intercept terms between group 1 vs. group 2? So for example, slope in group 1 vs. slope in group 2. Thank you! 


You can label the two slopes you want to compare and create a diff parameters in MODEL CONSTRAINT using the labels. Or you can use the labels in MODEL TEST. 

Daniel Lee posted on Wednesday, January 18, 2017  5:19 pm



makes perfect sense. thank you! 

Lily Assaad posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2017  12:44 pm



Hello, I am testing measurement invariance across race (4 races) within an ESEM framework. My model has 5 latent factors and 25 indicators. I achieved scalar invariance so I wanted to compare the means of my 4 races for each of the 5 factors. I did so by changing my reference group multiple times so as to get all the possible 2way ttests. However, I got different results depending on which group was the reference group. For example, when Asians were the reference and Americans (as well as blacks and hispanics) were in the model, the mean estimate for factor 1 was significant for americans. However, when Americans were the reference group and Asians (along with blacks and hispanics) were in the model, the mean estimate for factor1 (between asians and americans) was no longer significant. Thus, I have 2 questions. 1) Do you know why this is happening with me? 2) Is there a way to run all the possible 2way ttests between all the means across all races? Thanks! 


1. It shouldn't happen. Send your example to support@statmodel.com. As you change the reference group make sure the Loglikelihood value stays the same  if it is not the same then the models are not comparable like that. 2. You can use model constraint to form the differences between any two parameters. See User's Guide example 9.1 for how you can use model constraint. You can also run just one group with dummy covariates for each race (it is not exactly the same model but worth looking into). 

Lily Assaad posted on Tuesday, November 28, 2017  5:29 pm



Thanks! I sent it! 


From the files you sent I can see that when you changed the reference group from A to W factor 4 and 5 switched places, so keep this in mind when you are comparing the means. Also here is what happens when you change the reference group. Suppose A is the reference group and in group W the factor mean is M and the factor variance is V. if you switch A and W so that the W is the reference group the factor mean in A will be M/sqrt(V) and the factor variance will be 1/V. In one case you are testing M=0 and in the other you are testing M/sqrt(V)=0. Both tests are logically equivalent and they will always yield the same conclusion asymptotically, however, they can have different pvalues for finite sample size (this happens with maximumlikelihood estimation  it doesn't happen with Bayes). In most cases though the conclusion about significance doesn't change. You can verify this yourself using code along these lines model: f1f2 by y1y6 (*1); model g2: f1f2 (v1v2); [f1f2] (m1m2); model constraints: new(a1a2); a1=m1/sqrt(v1); a2=m2/sqrt(v2); You will be able to see that the significance of m1 and m2 is different from that of a1 and a2 which is the same as the one with reversed reference group. 


Dear all, I'm running a multigroup path analysis with a complex sampling design by using brrs and fay's correction. The analysis output alerts me that Chisquare is not availabe with replicate weights. Since my main objective is to compare the two groups I have, is there any other method I can use to test configural and paths/parameter invariance? So far, I looked only to RMSEA. Thank you in advance for your help Carlo 


One possible path is to look at the significance of the differences between the model parameters across the groups model g1: [y](m1); model g2: [y](m2); model constraint: new(d); d=m1m2; 


Dear Prof. Asparouhov, thank you so much for your immediate reply. I will follow your suggestion. Best regards, Carlo 


Hello, I am conducting a longitudinal multigroup analysis and I would like to make comparisons between my two groups, males and females, on the intercept, slope, as well as the associations between a timevarying predictor and the outcome variable. I have therefore done the following: model constraint: new(ifm); ifm=ifim; !differences in intercept new(s1fm); s1fm=s1fs1m; !differences in slope 1 new(s2fm); s2fm=s2fs2m; !differences in slope 2 new(d1fm); d1fm=d1fd1m; !differences in assoc between divorce1 and dep1 new(d2fm); d2fm=d2fd2m; !differences in assoc between divorce2 and dep2 new(d3fm); d3fm=d3fd3m; !differences in assoc between divorce3 and dep3 model test: 0 = ifm; 0 = s1fm; 0 = s2fm; 0 = d1fm; 0 = d2fm; 0 = d3fm; I am only seeing an overall Wald test in my output. However, I would like to test all of these separately. Is that possible? Or do I need to run this script individually for each test? Thanks! 


You see the individual tests in the regular output under New parameters  it is the zscores. 


Dear Sir or Madam, I'm running a theorybased mediation model with totally aggregated variables. I want to compare this model in 3 groups, however, I'm not sure what's the best way to do it. Basically, I want to see if the same theoretical model can be applied (or if it fits the data well) to 3 different groups. Grouping option doesn't really answer my question because it doesn't tell me if the model fits the data in different groups. Should I compare the model in groups separately? 


This sounds like a good general analysis strategy question for SEMNET. 

Back to top 