Message/Author 


I am fitting a logistic model where the dependent variable is categorical and has say, 5 levels such as 5 countries. If I use dummy variables to identify countries 25, I obtain estimates for the threshold for country 1 plus changes in the threshold for each of the remaining 4 countries. Can I fit the same model in a way equivalent to say, the noconstant option in STATA, where instead I get estimates/SE of the 5 countryspecific thresholds as part of the output? 


I think what you want is a multinomial logistic regression. You will obtain that if you put the dependent variable on the NOMINAL list. 


I'm thinking more along the lines of the following example: each subject is coded one if they are ill, 0 otherwise ('outcome'), with a dummy variable dummyUS=1 if from the US (0 otherwise), and dummyUK if from the UK (0 otherwise). If I fit the logistic model outcome ON dummyUK the threshold will be the estimated log odds of being from the US, and the coefficient for dummyUK will the change in the estimated log odds of being ill between UK and the US. Can I fit a model analogous to the STATA commmand: logit outcome dummyUS dummyUK, noconstant so that there will be a coefficient for dummyUS (the estimated log odds of being ill in the US), dummyUK (the estimated log odds of being ill in the UK), and with no additional 'threshold' estimated in the model? 


You can try [outcome$1@0]; outcome on dummyUS dummyUK; I don't know what will happen with those two covariates creating singularity, however. 


Thanks. That's what I am looking for. 

R McDowell posted on Friday, July 22, 2016  9:20 am



This is a followup to an old threadyes the above command does create a singularity problem. Model: [outcome$1@0]; outcome on dummyUS dummyUK; *** FATAL ERROR THE SAMPLE COVARIANCE MATRIX FOR THE INDEPENDENT VARIABLES IN THE MODEL CANNOT BE INVERTED. THIS CAN OCCUR IF A VARIABLE HAS NO VARIATION OR IF TWO VARIABLES ARE PERFECTLY CORRELATED. CHECK YOUR DATA. Has anyone had any further thoughts on other ways that could get round this in Mplus? 


If two independent variables are perfectly correlated, both cannot both be used in the analysis. 

Back to top 