TECH11 and TECH14 PreviousNext
Mplus Discussion > Growth Modeling of Longitudinal Data >
 Philip Jones posted on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 - 9:27 am
Hi. I have a few questions about the tests for comparing k- and (k-1)-class models:

(1) Should TECH11 *not* be used with the OPTSEED option? I notice that I get (sometimes dramatically) different results when using OPTSEED--usually a much lower p-value. Also I notice an extra set of iterations when using TECH11 without OPTSEED, so my hunch is that the H0 model is not getting properly optimized when OPTSEED is used. Is this correct?

(2) How much importance do you give the LMR test given the published criticism and the fact that the BLRT test is now available?

(3) For the BLRT test, why are zero or few random starts recommended for the H0 model? I'm sort of naively thinking that, e.g., if I needed 100/10 random starts for a 3-class model (i.e., "STARTS 100 10;"), then I would also need that many in the LRTSTARTS option when comparing it to a 4-class models (i.e., "LRTSTARTS 100 10 ...;").

Thanks again for all your help.
 Bengt O. Muthen posted on Thursday, December 14, 2006 - 12:50 pm
1. Yes, Tech11 currently does not have the Tech14 facility of "LRTSTARTS" and should therefore not rely on OPTSEED but a regular STARTS = run.

2. LMR doesn't work too poorly, judging from the Nylund et al paper on our web site, see Papers and Latent Class Analysis: Deciding on the Number of Classes.

3. Because the artificial data are generated according to the H0 (k-1-class) model the k-1 model is expected to be easy to find the best solution for, while the k-class model is harder. Starts = 100 10 refers to the real-data analysis where a latent class model for any k is not exactly the data-generating model.
 Karl Hallmackenreuther posted on Thursday, October 23, 2008 - 6:12 am
What about differences between BLRT and LRT LL-values (up to 20-30)? Is that an indication for too less no. of starting values in BLRT, i. e. BLRT-result is not trustworthy? However, I received no warning message concerning the latter issue.
 Linda K. Muthen posted on Thursday, October 23, 2008 - 9:32 am
If you are using Version 5.1, please send the outputs and your license number to
 Jonathan Larson posted on Monday, July 28, 2014 - 10:18 am
I have a question regarding Web Note 14.

Suppose the k-1-class model has a latent variable with a very small negative variance that is not significantly different from zero. This variance is constrained to zero, and no other errors arise. The same variance is non-negative in the k-class model, so it remains unconstrained.

If TECH11 or TECH14 is requested in the k-class model, will it compare the k-class model to an unconstrained k-1-class model? If so, are the results usable considering the k-1-class model we want to consider has an extra constraint?

Thank you!
 Bengt O. Muthen posted on Monday, July 28, 2014 - 3:47 pm
The k-class model will be used in the k-1-class run. Changing the continuous latent variable specification between the k- and k-1-class models will make the comparison invalid.
 Jonathan Larson posted on Tuesday, July 29, 2014 - 7:35 am
Thank you!
Back to top
Add Your Message Here
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message