|
 |
Maximum likelihood EFA with categoric... |
 
|
Message/Author |
|
yang posted on Sunday, September 08, 2013 - 5:40 am
|
|
|
I noticed that now we can do EFA analysis with categorical indicators using estimator = ML. My question is: Which parameterization is used when estimating the model, standardized or unstandardized? (By standardized I mean the loading-threshold parameterization which is typically encountered in item factor analysis literature; by unstandardized I mean the slope-intercept parameterization which is often used in IRT literature.) |
|
|
The use of the Mplus parameterization in IRT modeling is exemplified in the Cai et al. (2011) Psych Methods article on item bi-factor analysis. Page 224 talks about the binary item case and page 225 the graded case. The article refers to the Mplus parameterization as “slope-intercept” where the intercept is the negative threshold in Mplus. The article refers to the a(theta- b) IRT parameterization as the “slope-threshold” parameterization where the “threshold” is the b difficulty parameter, not what Mplus calls threshold. The authors find that the slope-intercept parameterization (used by Mplus) is more general, saying on page 224: Unfortunately, the slope-threshold form does not generalize well to truly multidimensional models, so we adopt the slope–intercept parameterization for this model and all remaining IRT models. The slope-intercept parameterization is also used in the Reckase (2009) book “Multidimensional IRT”; see section 4.1.1.1. |
|
yang posted on Sunday, September 08, 2013 - 4:22 pm
|
|
|
Thanks. So Mplus uses slope-intercept parameterization even for the ML exploratory item factor analysis (type = EFA, estimator = ML)? Then I guess that Mplus computes the SEs for rotated factor loadings via delta-method following this chain: slopes --> unrotated factor loadings --> rotated factor loadings Am I correct? |
|
|
Yes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|