As a follow-up to my question #3 on February 10, would adding the following commands provide me with the conditional unstandardized indirect relations of disc on dist and well through ih at low and high levels of coll? Essentially, below I am assuming that multiplying the conditional direct effect of disc on ih by the effect of ih on dist or well (i.e., the conditional effect of x on a mediator X the effect of a mediator on an outcome) will yield the conditional indirect effect.
I apologize for posting in multiple windows. I will avoid doing so in the future.
I have contacted Support to determine if I could analyze the data using the approach in 5.13. I look forward to hearing back about this matter.
I feel confident that I am correctly constructing the latent variable interaction using Steinmetz et al.'s approach. However, their paper does not address testing simple slopes for significant interactions or testing conditional indirect effects.
If possible, could you please comment on whether or not I am correctly computing the simple slopes described in the MODEL CONSTRAINTS of the 2/10 post and the conditional indirect effects described in the MODEL CONSTRAINTS of the 2/11 post?
I have a mod. mediation (2 mediators) with latents but got an error for parameter labels. Model Constraint: !M1=med1, M2=med2 NEW(LOW_AGE MED_AGE HIGH_AGE IND_LOWAGE_M1 IND_MEDAGE_M1 IND_HIAGE_M1 IND_LOWAGE_M2 IND_MEDAGE_M2 IND_HIAGE_M2 IMM_M1 IMM_M2 TOT_LOWAGE_M1 TOT_MEDAGE_M1 TOT_HIAGE_M1 TOT_LOWAGE_M2 TOT_MEDAGE_M2 TOT_HIAGE_M2); LOW_AGE=-1;MED_AGE=0;HIGH_AGE=1;