Last 3 Days
Multilevel CFA with continous latent ...
Multilevel Data/Complex Sample
posted on Thursday, December 06, 2012 - 11:03 am
I am trying to run a homologous multilevel CFA, meaning I am testing whether construct Y is equivalence at different levels of observation (individuals and teams).
Although the variables in the model are continuous, it happened that I had a better model fit when using ESTIMATION = WLSM (instead of the recomended MUML).
This is part of the sintax I am using:
TYPE = TWOLEVEL;
ESTIMATOR = wlsm;
ITERATIONS = 100000;
CONVERGENCE = 0.00005;
xbtik BY ik1-ik10;
xbttk BY tk1-tk10;
xwtik BY ik1-iki10;
xwttk BY tk1-tk10;
OUTPUT: Stand Res;
Hope you can help me.
Linda K. Muthen
posted on Thursday, December 06, 2012 - 1:35 pm
I'm not sure why you think MUML is recommended. The default is MLR.
Back to top
Add Your Message Here
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message