

Indirect effects in twolevel logisti... 

Message/Author 

Lesa Hoffman posted on Tuesday, September 30, 2008  2:36 pm



Greetings, I have a proposed twolevel model for a dichotomous outcome. I do not expect random slopes, only a random intercept. I am interested in multiple mediational effects (e.g., tests of indirect effects such as X > M > Y) at the between level. In reading through the version 5 manual, it appears I cannot use the MODEL INDIRECT command to test indirect effects when numeric integration is required. Further, bootstrapped SE’s and CI’s (that are often recommended when examining indirect effects) are not available with TYPE=TWOLEVEL. Given that I am trying to use a twolevel model for a dichotomous outcome, is there any kind of estimator or alternative procedure I can use in Mplus v. 5.1 in order to obtain formal tests of indirect effects (and contrasts between indirect effects) at the between level? I suppose one could model the level2 aggregates of level1 variables in a singlelevel analysis (although the outcome would still be dichotomous), but I wanted to see if there was a more principled way of doing this within the twolevel procedure. Thank you, Lesa Hoffman 


You would need to use MODEL CONSTRAINT to define that parameter and obtain a standard error for it. 

Lesa Hoffman posted on Thursday, October 02, 2008  10:20 am



Hi Linda, Thank you for your prompt and helpful response. I have tried to use the MODEL CONSTRAINT command to define an indirect effect as suggested (relevant part of syntax): %BETWEEN% Y ON X*; M ON X* (XM); Y ON M* (MY); MODEL CONSTRAINT: NEW (med*0); med=XM*MY; The estimate for the 'med' indirect effect in the output is not the value from multiplying the estimated XM (=.357)and MY (=.459) effects together (=.164), but something much smaller (=.012). Can you tell what I am doing wrong? Thank you again, Lesa Hoffman 


Please send the input, data, output, and license number to support@statmodel.com. 

Back to top 

