Combining MLM and parallel process LG... PreviousNext
Mplus Discussion > Multilevel Data/Complex Sample >
Message/Author
 Jill Glassman posted on Monday, August 08, 2011 - 3:43 pm
Hi I have datasets from longitudinal school-based group-randomized trials and am interested in performing mediation analyses where I have 2-1-1 designs: X>M>Y where X is treatment group and varies only at the group level, M and Y are a mediator and outcome respectively that vary across students within schools. I want to confirm that one can now perform a parallel process LGC mediation analysis (as in Cheong and MacKinnon, 2003) using the model INDIRECT statement together with the TYPE=TWOLEVEL option and that this then somehow decomposes the variance into between and within cluster variance components when obtaining standard errors of parameter estimates rather than just applying a post-hoc DEFF adjustment to SEs (as would happen if TYPE=COMPLEX were specified, right?)? Thus, this analysis would perform a true multilevel (time within student within school) mediation latent growth curve analysis where what would be the 1st level in a repeated measures MLM is treated as multivariate observations on M and Y and the 2nd and 3rd levels are explicitly modeled as 2-level multilevel models would be in MLwiN. Not sure if I am stating this correctly and would love any corrections. Thanks very much.
 Bengt O. Muthen posted on Monday, August 08, 2011 - 4:47 pm
That is the right way to look it. And it is doable in an Mplus Type = Twolevel analysis where on the Between level your treatment affects the between-level part of the student M and Y variables. The longitudinal aspect does not add a level but is handled in a wide format. You can form any indirect effects that you want using Model Constraint.
 Jill Glassman posted on Wednesday, August 10, 2011 - 11:07 am
Thank you, this is very helpful. Based on your last sentence it sounds like Mplus can also be used to analyze models that are an extension of the MSEM cross-sectional models presented in Preacher et al. (2010), with the extension being that you can incorporate the longitudinal nature of the data using LGC within the MSEM framework. Do you know of any place I might find how one would actually parameterize these models? Thanks again.
 Bengt O. Muthen posted on Wednesday, August 10, 2011 - 3:00 pm
Can't think of papers on this others? But try it out doing what comes natural using the Mplus language and we will help you.
 Jill Glassman posted on Friday, August 12, 2011 - 1:43 pm
Thank you! We will take a stab at it. One more follow-up question. Is it possible to test whether the difference between the between-group and within-group components of the indirect effect of a mediator are significantly different? Again, I haven't seen anything written on this in the literature but suspect it can be done in Mplus.
 Bengt O. Muthen posted on Friday, August 12, 2011 - 5:40 pm
Yes, you use Model Constraint to define the two indirect effects and their difference using the New option. The difference estimate will have a SE for testing.
Back to top
Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action: